The Stability of Hedonic Coalition Structures
نویسندگان
چکیده
We consider the partitioning of a society into coalitions in purely hedonic settings; i.e., where each player's payo is completely determined by the identity of other members of her coalition. We rst discuss how hedonic and non-hedonic settings di er and some su cient conditions for the existence of core stable coalition partitions in hedonic settings. We then focus on a weaker stability condition: individual stability, where no player can bene t from moving to another coalition while not hurting the members of that new coalition. We show that if coalitions can be ordered according to some characteristic over which players have single-peaked preferences, or where players have symmetric and additively separable preferences, then there exists an individually stable coalition partition. Examples show that without these conditions, individually stable coalition partitions may not exist. We also discuss some other stability concepts, and the incompatibility of stability with other normative properties.
منابع مشابه
A Taxonomy of Myopic Stability Concepts for Hedonic Games
We present a taxonomy of myopic stability concepts for hedonic games in terms of deviations, and discuss the status of the existence problems of stable coalition structures. In particular, we show that contractual strictly core stable coalition structures always exist, and provide su¢ cient conditions for the existence of contractually Nash stable and weak individually stable coalition structur...
متن کاملIndividual Stability in Hedonic Coalition Formation
I study the existence of Nash-stable and individually stable coalition structures in hedonic coalition formation games, where a coalition structure is a partition of the players, and players strictly rank the coalitions to which they belong. The hedonic coalition formation game in which all coalitions are feasible is viewed as a general model, and more specific models, such as the marriage and ...
متن کاملIndividual-based stability in hedonic games depending on the best or worst players
We consider classes of hedonic games in which each player’s preferences over coalition structures are induced by the best player (Band B-hedonic games) or the worst player (Wand W-hedonic games) in his coalition. For these classes, which allow for concise representation, we analyze the computational complexity of deciding the existence of and computing individually stable, Nash stable, and indi...
متن کاملRandom Paths to Stability in Hedonic Coalition Formation
We study the myopic stability of hedonic coalition formation. Myopic stability means that for each unstable coalition structure there exists a sequence of myopic blockings that leads to a stable coalition structure. The main result is a characterization of the hedonic coalition formation models which are myopically stable whenever a stable coalition structure exists. One interesting implication...
متن کاملar X iv : 1 10 5 . 18 24 v 2 [ cs . G T ] 3 D ec 2 01 1 Individual - based stability in hedonic games depending on the best or worst players ∗
We consider hedonic coalition formation games in which each player has preferences over the other players and his preferences over coalition structures are based on the best player (B-/B-hedonic games) or the worst player (W /W-hedonic games) in his coalition. We show that for B-hedonic games, an individually stable partition is guaranteed to exist and can be computed efficiently. Similarly, th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Games and Economic Behavior
دوره 38 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002